An investment crowdfunding platform — investor portal, project or issuer area and back office — adapted to your jurisdiction, workflows and brand. It is not a template you finish yourself and not a project started from an empty repository: we begin from an existing platform specification covering the domain model, regulatory workflows, payment flows, compliance rules, integration contracts and the tests that verify them.

Yes, the platform is delivered under your brand. But white label describes the branding, not the commercial model. Unlike a classic white-label subscription, FinMV offers a defined route to owning the delivered implementation rather than renting it indefinitely.

Yes. The client owns or receives the agreed rights to the delivered client implementation, either from day one or at the end of a Build-to-Own term. FinMV retains its pre-existing technology, reusable specifications, generic components, architecture patterns and know-how — you receive your platform, not our entire company.

A lower entry payment plus a monthly fee during a managed period, after which the agreed source rights transfer to you. Because we finance the entry and carry the operational burden meanwhile, its total cost is higher than buying outright — that trade-off is stated up front rather than discovered later.

Yes. Own from Day One means the agreed rights to the delivered implementation pass to you at delivery, with no managed period in between. It is the shortest route to independence and the lowest total cost.

No. FinMV has historically been built in PHP, but the specification, business rules and test suite are defined independently of any framework. Implementations are delivered on a published list of supported targets covering Java, Kotlin, C#, Go, Python, TypeScript and PHP backends with React, Angular or Vue front ends, PostgreSQL, Redis and queues. If you have no preference, take the option recommended by FinMV.

No. The default is a modular implementation with clear domain boundaries, explicit contracts and independent tests. Services are extracted when scale, security, compliance, deployment boundaries or team structure justify it — not because distributed systems are fashionable. Because the boundaries exist from the start, extraction is a planned operation rather than a rewrite.

Both are possible. The platform can run on infrastructure we operate or entirely in your own cloud or data centre, which matters when data residency is a regulatory requirement rather than a preference. Deployment configuration and infrastructure instructions are part of what is handed over.

Yes, and no. Support after ownership is a separate product — maintenance, managed operations or architecture advisory — never a condition of owning what you paid for. A handover includes the database schema, deployment instructions, documentation and the tests covering your implementation, which is what another team actually needs to take it over.

That is the normal case. Onboarding and KYC/KYB/AML checks, payment providers, banking APIs, e-signature, accounting and CRM systems, reporting interfaces and your own internal APIs are integrated through explicit contracts, so a provider can be replaced later without rebuilding the platform around it.

Public anchors for each commercial model are published on the pricing page so you know the order of the budget before speaking to anyone. The exact figure comes from the configurator and depends on jurisdiction and regulatory complexity, the modules and integrations you need, migration, non-functional requirements, the selected technology target and the ownership model. It never depends on how wealthy your country is.

No. FinMV provides software and technical implementation; regulatory and legal requirements depend on your jurisdiction and business model, and legal advice should be obtained from qualified counsel. What we can do is introduce you to fintech lawyers in our network by jurisdiction, and point you to our country-by-country regulation overview. Read more